My Account
You don't have the ability to post right now...
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 27, 2024
6:51
:40
pm
NYCougz
Intervention Needed
Out for 68-74 weeks
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
NYCougz
Bio page
NYCougz
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Last login
Oct 27, 2024
Total posts
3,248 (1 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
May have been discussed but did sitake discuss postgame why LJ didn’t play more
BYU '80
6:49pm
LJ himself said he’s fine
canuckchuck
6:51pm
Out for 68-74 weeks
NYCougz
6:51pm
I figured it was more precautionary than anything
SUAVO
6:51pm
Why would he play more? Why risk injury?
cougarfann888
6:51pm
When byu was starting to struggle to get first downs and the lead was 34-18
BYU '80
6:58pm
Ropati was doing really well and LJ is still coming back. Had 102 yards. No need
WP17
6:53pm
Game was over. Precautionary. No injury and making sure they keep it that way for Holy War
JohnnyComeLately
6:58pm
At 34-18 with ten minutes left it wasn’t over
BYU '80
6:59pm
It was.
Conan
7:00pm
BYU had to execute multiple third downs. If they hadn’t the same guy who led
BYU '80
7:24pm
A third and then they still would have needed a fourth
cougarfann888
7:35pm
If byu had failed to get first downs and kicked a fg they would have had
BYU '80
7:49pm
I will go with Kalani’s opinion over yours and the words of LJ himself.
JohnnyComeLately
7:57pm
Unless you had Kalani on the phone during the time of the game it was 34-18
BYU '80
8:06pm
Ok. So if the game had played out differently than it did, I suspect we would have seen LJ.
Spiff
8:05pm
Considering LJ was about the only known starter not in the game at 34-18
BYU '80
8:06pm
Fine. It's a valid question. You've been given several valid answers. It's on you if you don't like them.
Spiff
8:08pm
Which answers were valid. We never got an answer. Every response here has been
BYU '80
8:19pm
I guess you're right then. He was hurt and BYU almost lost.
Spiff
8:24pm
I asked if he was hurt. At 34–18 the game wasn’t over
BYU '80
8:28pm
Maybe read my post one more time. What does precautionary mean to you?
JohnnyComeLately
8:31pm
I saw what you said. That was an opinion but never confirmed.
BYU '80
8:39pm
And he told Wrubell he was healthy. So not sure what point you are trying to make.
JohnnyComeLately
8:49pm
If the game was won, why only take him out? It’s a pretty clear point
BYU '80
10:31pm
RE: At 34-18 with ten minutes left it wasn’t over
JohnnyComeLately
7:05pm
For those laughing, Greg and Hans were asking the same question on the radio
BYU '80
6:59pm
The question has been asked many times but you may not have seen
NYCougz
7:29pm
I hadn’t seen which is the reason I asked as stated in the original post
BYU '80
7:50pm
If he is hurt, sadly sitake won’t be clear about it
NYCougz
8:39pm
LJ in post game said it was a charlie horse.
Lance71
7:00pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
