My Account
Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 10, 2024
10:10
:49
pm
Tokolosh
Stop the Stupid party member
Depends on the efficiency. GM made progress vs the Ford Lightning. Hopefully Scout makes gains too.
But yeah, I’m not going on a long overland adventure in an EV any time soon.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Tokolosh
Bio page
Tokolosh
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Last login
Dec 21, 2024
Total posts
62,407 (5,932 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
I’m pretty excited that VW & International are putting money back into the Scout brand. Could make an awesome EV.
Tokolosh
Stop the Stupid party member
Oct 10, 9:22pm
In the 1960’s the IH Scout was the mission vehicle (Southwest Indian Mission).
Real G Man
Oct 10, 9:44pm
Tell me about the practicality of an off-road EV?
SierraCoug
Oct 10, 9:57pm
Pro: Low end, smooth, torque control.
Tokolosh
Oct 10, 10:03pm
Maybe I’m being unfair, but it seems like battery life overrides all of the pros.
SierraCoug
Oct 10, 10:08pm
Depends on the efficiency. GM made progress vs the Ford Lightning. Hopefully Scout makes gains too.
Tokolosh
Oct 10, 10:10pm
I searched if any EV could do the 22-mile Rubicon trail and said nope with exception of Rivian RS1 that supposedly
SierraCoug
Oct 10, 10:15pm
I doubt any other EV has the clearance/off-road specs to do the Rubicon.
IdahoCoug
Oct 10, 10:37pm
Yeah the wrangler 4xe in its current form is a plugin hybrid
jxncoog
Oct 10, 10:43pm
Probably right if it’s from the factory, but few ICE SUVs from factory could do it either. The point is, even if
SierraCoug
Oct 10, 10:49pm
RE: Probably right if it’s from the factory, but few ICE SUVs from factory could do it either. The point is, even if
IdahoCoug
Oct 10, 10:56pm
*R1S
m0resn0w
Oct 11, 2:07am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad