so if you want to downplay domination of a rival based on them not being very good, you have to take Lavell's dominance over them as equally suspect as Rose's. But you're probably not going to do that. The argument should be thrown out. There are many reasons Utah sucked in the Lavell's era that Lavell was directly responsible for causing, and the same goes for Rose. I'm not trying to attack Bronco here. Of course Utah is much better today. But the trend of losing to them most of the time is troubling nonetheless.