It should be part of the rule. Reward a crappy throw. Under the rules you are

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 9, 2025
9:00:17pm

Iman23 Truly Addicted User

It should be part of the rule. Reward a crappy throw. Under the rules you are

Right.

I just don’t like the rule in that instance…

Report problem with this ad

Iman23

Bio page: Iman23
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Last login: Jan 10, 2025
Total posts: 44,981 (3,037 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

How in the world can you claim that that is a good call?!!

Cougar TD

Jan 9, 8:31pm

There was early contact and there was a chance to break up the interference

cougaman

Jan 9, 8:32pm

Based on what gets called at times and what isn't called, that's a bad call..

Cougar TD

Jan 9, 8:33pm

There’s early contact. Defender didn’t play the ball. I

cougaman

Jan 9, 8:35pm

There is contact and then there is "contact" ... That was "contact" . I see it

Cougar TD

Jan 9, 8:40pm

I think it’s the fact that he hit him before the ball got there and interfered with his ability to catch the ball.

TwinsRight

Jan 9, 8:33pm

He had a good chance of at least breaking up the interception

cougaman

Jan 9, 8:34pm

No he didn’t. No way. Momentum going the other direction even without contact

Iman23

Jan 9, 8:44pm

You say that based off a slow motion replay, even if he didn’t have that chance,

cougaman

Jan 9, 8:52pm

It should be part of the rule. Reward a crappy throw. Under the rules you are

Iman23

Jan 9, 9:00pm

So you are saying that it was the right call, and being the right call they

cougaman

Jan 9, 9:02pm

It was the correct call. I don’t have a dog in this fight.

Samsonite

Jan 9, 8:34pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad