The ASU targeting was after his teammate intercepted the ball, pretty clearly

Jan 8, 2025
11:09:54am

Captain Stubing All-American

Not sure on the rules, so at that point, it may have only been a targeting ejection and 15 yard penalty and the interception would still stand.

Report problem with this ad

Captain Stubing

Bio page: Captain Stubing
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Last login: Jan 9, 2025
Total posts: 3,586 (2 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I just saw the targeting no call in the texas vs asu game. I'm shocked I didn't

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 10:33am

The same player who did that target had a nasty face mask a few plays earlier. That face mask makes me want to be able

Viva Campeche

Jan 8, 10:36am

Video

Viva Campeche

Jan 8, 10:37am

Dude should be ejected for the whole next game.

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 10:44am

Then the absurdity to ask for a PI call after trying to break the guy’s neck.

Viva Campeche

Jan 8, 10:45am

The one where ASU intercepted Texas and the dude launched & hit a defenseless

foofcoug

Jan 8, 10:39am

No, I saw that play too, and that looked like asu player hit his chest. Texas

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 10:45am

I think both of the plays are colored by the feelings of those who are watching

foofcoug

Jan 8, 10:49am

It would not have overturned the interception because it was after the int.

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 11:08am

The ASU targeting was after his teammate intercepted the ball, pretty clearly

Captain Stubing

Jan 8, 11:09am

That should have been a targeting as well

acougfan

Jan 8, 10:56am

I'd like the NCAA to review it. They need to tell us why it's not targeting or they need to admit it was a bad call. If

HarlemCoug

Jan 8, 10:40am

Refs told the ASU coach he wasn't defenseless so it had to be the crown of the

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 10:48am

Yep - this was part of the Jomboy breakdown of the game.

StantonMac

Jan 8, 10:59am

Or is a convenient excuse for a horrific no call

BYU '80

Jan 8, 11:14am

Where did you see that explanation? That is crazy

shimmy

Jan 8, 11:07am

Timestamp 6:08 is where the analysis starts. Language warning.

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 12:26pm

I don't think you can draw a conclusion of the detailed ruling based on that breakdown. I think he was defenseless

shimmy

Jan 8, 12:54pm

I think jomboy's lip reading is accurate about the question ASU coach asked.

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 1:43pm

If this is the case then it would be nice for the NCAA to give clarity on why he wasn't defenseless and why they would

HarlemCoug

Jan 8, 11:10am

Clearly defenseless. That’s nuts

BYU '80

Jan 8, 11:13am

I understand why they didn't call it due to the lack of indicators, but the rule says "when in question it is a foul"

shimmy

Jan 8, 11:02am

If he is defenseless then all it takes is leading with the helmet. He clearly

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 11:14am

Where did they say the guys was defenseless. I can't find it.

shimmy

Jan 8, 11:16am

Refs said he wasn't defenseless, but I disagree. I think its pretty obvious he

here's to hoping

Jan 8, 12:24pm

Thank you, this is what was ignored. The receiver clearly didn't have time to

Posting on CougarBoard