Jan 8, 2025
10:40:17am
10:40:17am
I'd like the NCAA to review it. They need to tell us why it's not targeting or they need to admit it was a bad call. If
it's not targeting then I'm curious why not? Please give the specific reasons so we understand the rule better.
It was a defenseless player who got injured by a blow to the head. If it's not technically targeting then can we change the rules in a way to make it targeting in the future??
The defensive player had good form, but for the fact that he hit the receiver's head. The defensive player should have had his helmet to the side of the receiver's head. Had he done that it would have been a clean hit and the receiver wouldn't have gotten a head injury.
It was a defenseless player who got injured by a blow to the head. If it's not technically targeting then can we change the rules in a way to make it targeting in the future??
The defensive player had good form, but for the fact that he hit the receiver's head. The defensive player should have had his helmet to the side of the receiver's head. Had he done that it would have been a clean hit and the receiver wouldn't have gotten a head injury.
- Previous username
- Big12
- Bio page
- HarlemCoug
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2014
- Last login
- Jan 9, 2025
- Total posts
- 37,201 (4,755 FO)
Messages
Time
The same player who did that target had a nasty face mask a few plays earlier. That face mask makes me want to be able
Jan 8, 10:36am
Jan 8, 10:39am
I'd like the NCAA to review it. They need to tell us why it's not targeting or they need to admit it was a bad call. If
Jan 8, 10:40am
Jan 8, 11:07am