It would have been a good strategy if they had *punted* instead of the throw

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 25, 2024
11:53:02am

RGGeemer Intervention Needed

It would have been a good strategy if they had *punted* instead of the throw

downfield.

Report problem with this ad

RGGeemer

Previous username: rggee
Bio page: RGGeemer
Joined: Aug 18, 2010
Last login: Nov 25, 2024
Total posts: 72,223 (760 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Somebody can check me but *if* they called intentional grounding, it wouldn't

rcbyufan

11:48am

I believe this is correct. And we would have got the ball at the spot where he threw it

Skeptical Optimist

11:48am

This is why the strategy was so dumb IMO.

rcbyufan

11:50am

Amazingly stupid strategy

Skeptical Optimist

11:51am

It would have been a good strategy if they had *punted* instead of the throw

RGGeemer

11:53am

Yes.

rcbyufan

11:54am

Michigan:

Skeptical Optimist

12:01pm

The stupid thing was ASU could have just had QB sprint to the right to get out

ybecausethatswhy

11:59am

I thought we did get the ball at the spot where he threw it. That's what Kalani

momowagon

11:52am

We didn't. It was 4th down on the 50 (where we got it). Leavitt threw it from

RGGeemer

11:52am

Not even closed we got screwed out of 9 or 10 yards

11:53am

Correct.

RGGeemer

11:50am

At the time, it was actually awarded incorrectly, though. They have since

RGGeemer

11:52am

That's the game.

rcbyufan

11:54am

That's where I do wish Kalani would work the refs more. Intentional grounding is

BYUHawk

12:02pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad