This is your brand = “program momentum”.
The committee has explicitly said it’s supposed to be based on the current season only.

2. Your arguments about past seasons are largely invalidated by the realignments. Your examples of two Big XII teams typically include Oklahoma and/or Texas who are no longer in the BigXII and since “program momentum”, according to you should matter a lot, this argues against them including two Big XII teams.

3. You sound like you’re defending something like segregation. “Separate but equal” even though everyone knows it’s not equal. You should consider taking a step back and reading your arguments. It’s not equal and perhaps you’d be better served arguing it shouldn’t be equal rather than trying to convince people to not believe their lying eyes.

I have no desire to get into a back and forth but just wanted to point out that your own logic is not helping you here even though some of the arguments against your point are also logically flawed.