My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Nov 14, 2024
9:07
:49
pm
RGGeemer
Intervention Needed
Sorry thought you were momowagon
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
RGGeemer
Previous username
rggee
Bio page
RGGeemer
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Last login
Nov 14, 2024
Total posts
71,919 (758 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Here's why the Unsportsmanlike penalty on Harlan would not have negated a TD:
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:39pm
I don't think that's true if you are on the field of play. Are you saying if a
cougarfann888
Nov 14, 12:41pm
If the coach tackled a defender, that would be affecting the play and it would
SoCalCoug
Nov 14, 12:43pm
What is the definition of "affecting the play"?
SUAVO
Nov 14, 12:47pm
Judgement call by the ref. This ref called it as unsportsmanlike.
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:47pm
That's my paraphrase of the principle. I'm not sure what the exact wording is,
SoCalCoug
Nov 14, 12:48pm
In the case of a tackle I think the ref calls a penalty for too many men which
jre85
Nov 14, 3:01pm
Hopefully the ref wouldn't call that as unsportsmanlike. That would be another
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:45pm
Away from the play? The keep-away play was all over the field.
Les IsMore
Nov 14, 2:44pm
Is that the NCAA rules? It's not a TD in college
stansburycoug
Nov 14, 12:42pm
Wasn't there a Steelers coach who tripped a player from the sideline a few years ago?
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 12:45pm
There are several different application to dead ball in college
stansburycoug
Nov 14, 12:49pm
Tomlin was in the way on the sideline, but didn't touch him
steelerguy99
Nov 14, 12:52pm
THis lines up with the rule. The RB in this example is not a non-player. Harlan
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:47pm
Harlan and Whit should have been out blocking and impeding would be tacklers ?
stansburycoug
Nov 14, 12:50pm
That would have been a different penalty than "Unsportsmanlike conduct".
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:53pm
? what penalty would that be? I've reffed up to HS, I'm curious what it is?
stansburycoug
Nov 14, 12:55pm
I think the problem here is we've seen the application on defense
stansburycoug
Nov 14, 1:06pm
Are you sure he is a non player?
dratax
Nov 14, 7:45pm
What if he was out there blocking? That doesn't make sense.
GfB
Nov 14, 12:42pm
But it does. If he blocked a player involved in the play, that would negate the
SoCalCoug
Nov 14, 12:44pm
Well in that case his mere physical presence on the field affects that play. Even as just a distraction.
GfB
Nov 14, 12:46pm
That is not the rule.
SoCalCoug
Nov 14, 12:46pm
It would be a different penalty than just "Unsportsmanlike Conduct"
SoCalCoug
Nov 14, 12:47pm
Wait, Unfair acts are still called as "Unsportsmanlike Conduct"
Zoobieman
Nov 14, 3:09pm
This is correct. There is no “Unfair Acts” penalty. The penalty is still called
RalphWiggam
Nov 14, 3:17pm
You would agree that if Harlan didn't interfere with play, that would not negate
momowagon
Nov 14, 3:37pm
You would agree that running onto the field and yelling at the refs during play is interfering with the play, right?
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 3:44pm
Not if the runner isn't near players or the ball.
momowagon
Nov 14, 4:13pm
The refs are part of the play. If he interferes with the ref, by definition he's interfering with the play.
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 4:25pm
Nope, by rule it has to be "interfering with the ball or a player while the ball
momowagon
Nov 14, 4:31pm
Skeptical, The rulebook gives a specific example backing Momowagon
Zoobieman
Nov 14, 4:38pm
I stand corrected, but my main point still remains. If the Utes had managed to score
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 4:44pm
How would they justify it? Being on the field is only interfering with the play
momowagon
Nov 14, 5:03pm
But he can't use that leeway unless he determines that play was interfered with.
momowagon
Nov 14, 3:35pm
The Verbiage "Unsportmanlike Conduct" is still used for Unfair acts
Zoobieman
Nov 14, 4:34pm
Sure, but the penalties for those are different. Negating the TD would require
momowagon
Nov 14, 4:37pm
I was responding to the wrong post. . . my mistake.
Zoobieman
Nov 14, 4:46pm
I would bet if they are calling one with a penalty different than
momowagon
Nov 14, 5:00pm
How do you define "involved" in the play? Was Harlan not involved?
LegitCoug
Nov 14, 12:47pm
You could argue that, but you would lose.
SoCalCoug
Nov 14, 12:47pm
Huh. Well, kind of a fun thought experiment anyway.
LegitCoug
Nov 14, 12:48pm
The Ref who made the call said unsportsmanlike conduct, not something else.
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:49pm
Wrong. There is no “unfair act” penalty. The penalty for Unfair Act is
RalphWiggam
Nov 14, 3:18pm
Unfair Act is a type of Unsportsmanlike penalty. if it's not called as an unfair
momowagon
Nov 14, 3:38pm
Yes. And when there is an unfair act the penalty is “unsportsmanlike conduct.”
RalphWiggam
Nov 14, 6:39pm
The ref can't negate the TD unless it's the unfair act type. If they want to
momowagon
Nov 14, 6:47pm
They would simply call unsportsmanlike conduct. Period.
RalphWiggam
Nov 14, 7:08pm
Interesting. If that's the case...
LegitCoug
Nov 14, 12:44pm
Well I would expect penalties outside of the game for that, IE lifetime bans for
Stopper6700
Nov 14, 12:46pm
Because if they interrupt the play that's a different penalty. The ref called
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:50pm
That would have been the most Utah way to win
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 12:44pm
Taken to an extreme, what if a bunch of students ran onto the field and tackled BYU players to allow a TD by Utah.
KingDave
Nov 14, 12:44pm
That would result in negating the play.
SoCalCoug
Nov 14, 12:45pm
Yes, because it would be something other than unsportsmanlike.
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:51pm
I don't know about that. Do you remember when Utah fans rushed the field during
cougarfan84
Nov 14, 12:46pm
That wasn't called as "unsportsmanlike." It was sideline interference. If Harlan
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:52pm
I wonder if Utah had managed to return it for a TD if the refs would have changed it to a live ball
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 1:29pm
I think this is very possible. Harlan was in the middle of several players
NYC and Japan
Nov 14, 1:40pm
I can just see the refs huddling and saying "If we say it's unsportsmanlike conduct, the
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 2:04pm
When you are being very publicly, verbally harassed by the AD, easy choice
NYC and Japan
Nov 14, 3:05pm
So what prevents non-players from disrupting the game?
HuskerFan2
Nov 14, 12:46pm
That would be a different penalty, not Unsportsmanlike Conduct.
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:54pm
This makes perfect sense. How many times does momowagon have to repeat it?
AT Cougar
Nov 14, 1:18pm
If your on the field you would be considered a player in my opinion.
maYbe
Nov 14, 12:52pm
Nice opinion! That's not what the rules say.
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:55pm
The rule doesn't define a player.
maYbe
Nov 14, 12:56pm
Need a rules expert to weigh in here. An administrator five yards into the field
RalphWiggam
Nov 14, 12:53pm
The Ref must have concluded that Harlan didn't effect the play, or he would have
momowagon
Nov 14, 12:56pm
You keep saying that but do you know what other options he had? If you don't
coug10278
Nov 14, 12:57pm
I think it would be an "Unfair Act" which is:
momowagon
Nov 14, 1:11pm
You continue to misinterpret the rule and the penalty. There is no penalty for
RalphWiggam
Nov 14, 3:15pm
You're confusing the call with the penalty. A ref would have to determine that
momowagon
Nov 14, 3:40pm
I think there likely would have been something else called had Utah scored
goidcougs
Nov 14, 1:15pm
The refs have the authority in the rule book to determine for themselves if an
Ghost of Peanut
Nov 14, 1:01pm
Chat GPT for the win:
MotorCityCoug
Nov 14, 1:24pm
Unfortunately a BYU player didn’t light him up. Thus creating “interference”.
DiamondMo
Nov 14, 1:17pm
Oof, we totally stole that game
Brandoblueblood
Nov 14, 1:24pm
This seems like an Oregon-esque loophole that could be exploited if true
Brandoblueblood
Nov 14, 1:22pm
Man, I wish a BYU player would have ran into him accidently.
TRUE_BLUE_COUGY
Nov 14, 1:32pm
Then we might see fans or other non players storm the field on a play like that.
SoValleyCOUG
Nov 14, 2:01pm
Please see the dozen explanations above that refute this.
BlooGeek
Nov 14, 2:27pm
Devils advocate… did they change it to unsportsmanlike after? Wouldn’t it have
1984coug
Nov 14, 2:20pm
Unsportsmanlike is the correct call if Harlan doesn't interfere with the play.
momowagon
Nov 14, 2:38pm
It would be easy for the refs to say that somebody coming onto the field to yell at them during the play
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 2:43pm
It is still the correct call even if he does interfere with the play. Because
RalphWiggam
Nov 14, 3:30pm
No, it would be Unsportsmalike with the unfair acts modifier. You can't negate
momowagon
Nov 14, 3:44pm
Probably wrong . . . Read one section further for "Unfair Acts"
Zoobieman
Nov 14, 2:42pm
I already posted this above. If it's called as an unfair act the Ref can amend
momowagon
Nov 14, 2:55pm
Fair enough - Unfair acts are called as "Unsportmanlike conduct"
Zoobieman
Nov 14, 3:06pm
When they fumbled and we recovered, it didn't matter what penalty they called
Skeptical Optimist
Nov 14, 3:10pm
So the entire Ute waterboy and photo journalist sideline could run on and block?
Dr MoBYU
Nov 14, 3:27pm
This thread is a great example of a trap a lot of lawyers fall into all
SoCalCoug
Nov 14, 3:48pm
Thanks Matlock!
momowagon
Nov 14, 3:58pm
Utah always trying to find loopholes in the rules.
Boring
Nov 14, 3:57pm
Doesn’t matter and who cares
Carnac
Nov 14, 4:12pm
RE: Doesn’t matter and who cares
momowagon
Nov 14, 4:32pm
This doesn't seem to square with any other event in football. Here, the KR team is the offense, and the KO team is the
Bob Vance
Nov 14, 5:28pm
1. The rules treat a non-player committing a foul during play the same as
momowagon
Nov 14, 5:42pm
No, because Holmoe represents the defense in that case. Defensive penalties almost never result in stoppage.
Bob Vance
Nov 14, 5:45pm
And Utah would decline it obviously.
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 7:58pm
Not what they did in 2012.
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 7:57pm
Yes they did. Penalty was enforced on the end of the play.
momowagon
Nov 14, 8:04pm
Nope. If so, it should have been Utah ball. They had stopped us on 4th down
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 8:11pm
<< Deleted >>
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 8:14pm
Even if it was 4th down, the penalty would have given us a 1st down. We got
momowagon
Nov 14, 8:32pm
I can guarantee you 100% that those refs would have not let a TD stand.
dallasbyu
Nov 14, 6:20pm
They absolutely would have because they had stuck to the letter of the law
momowagon
Nov 14, 6:27pm
Then why did we get to kick another FG in 2012?
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 6:56pm
That is a good example that proves my point. We got an untimed down 15 yards
momowagon
Nov 14, 7:11pm
But it was 4th down. Utah football. Unless it was a live ball foul. Which is
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 7:53pm
Link
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 7:54pm
A live ball foul on a non-player is enforced on the end of the play as if it
momowagon
Nov 14, 8:08pm
It would have been Utah football in that case. It wasn't. They enforced it
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 8:11pm
It was 3rd down but we still failed a FG. Utah ball. Unless they enforced it as
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 8:13pm
Even if it was 4th down, the 15 yard penalty gives us 1st down with the ball.
momowagon
Nov 14, 8:35pm
How would it? Dead ball foul would be after the turnover on downs. Like an
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 8:57pm
Yeah if it's enforced after the play then turnover in downs has happened
cougarfann888
Nov 14, 9:00pm
Exactly my point. It was a live ball foul. Enforced as a live ball foul.
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 9:06pm
Sorry thought you were momowagon
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 9:07pm
Never mind. We attempted and failed a FG and then failed to advance the ball
RGGeemer
Nov 14, 9:09pm
Forget the penalty for a second
LV Coug
Nov 14, 9:39pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad