So $30M per team in PAC10 vs $42 in BIG12. 40% more $$$ in BIG12. That’s huge!

Report problem with this ad

Jul 3, 2022
1:00:20pm

The_Cuss Truly Addicted User

Report problem with this ad

The_Cuss

New username: Atmospheric_Cougar
Bio page: The_Cuss
Joined: Aug 23, 2016
Last login: Mar 21, 2023
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

New pac12 valuation. Down 200 million.

DodgerMike

7/3/22 9:22am

And that is why they are DOA.

Turnpike Lane

7/3/22 9:25am

RE: New pac12 valuation. Down 200 million.

byuluvr

7/3/22 9:27am

If they were to band together and stay at 10, and they get $300M, that means

NOCAL_YFAN

7/3/22 9:55am

But who will guarantee that $30mil long-term with falling numbers?

rad dawg

7/3/22 10:04am

That’s the thing. They need a GOR but that tips the hand of anyone leaving.

Baylorbears11

7/3/22 11:37am

There's also the additive value to consider though.

tacallaway

7/3/22 10:05am

If his estimate of Oregon and UW's value is accurate, the B1G may not add either

shoganai

7/3/22 10:24am

Yep. It will come down to logistics vs. money add for the B1G.

BYUHgrad

7/3/22 11:12am

Down 40%. If Big XII matches expectations they can offer more $$ to teams.

Kral

7/3/22 11:31am

Helpful Background on Big 12 Revenue

runningryan

7/3/22 12:30pm

So $30M per team in PAC10 vs $42 in BIG12. 40% more $$$ in BIG12. That’s huge!

The_Cuss

7/3/22 1:00pm

And that assumes that Big 12 numbers don’t increase with PAC additions.

Baylorbears11

7/3/22 1:06pm

True, as long as it is the top 2-4 PAC teams being added.

The_Cuss

7/3/22 1:36pm

It’s pretty clear it would be a win win for the B12 and the new PAC schools.

runningryan

7/3/22 1:39pm

That's slightly misleading (for a few reasons)

krindorr

7/3/22 3:03pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad