May 13, 2010
12:48:32am
12:48:32am
That's irrelevant. Stop obsessing over the current
TV numbers and look down the road a little.
Both the Pac-10 and the Big 12 are going to get a lot more money from their new deals.
If Texas thought it could make more from the Pac-10's future, still-to-be-negotiated deal than from the Big 12's future, still-to-be-negotiated deal, then logic dictates that they would consider it.
Yes, Texas currently makes more than USC from TV revenue. I know that, having posted my research on that very topic previously (see, for example this post).
But the current TV revenue is irrelevant to the future, and only represents a portion of Texas' total football revenue (albeit a significant portion).
Originally posted on May 13, 2010 at 12:48:32am
Message modified by on May 13, 2010 at 12:48:32am
- New username
- Abe Froman
- Bio page
- Rise and Shout
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2006
- Last login
- Jul 16, 2010
- Total posts
- 0 (0 FO)
Messages
Time
5/12/10 10:54pm
5/12/10 10:57pm
5/12/10 11:09pm
5/12/10 11:16pm
5/12/10 11:19pm
5/12/10 11:28pm
5/12/10 11:36pm
5/13/10 9:51am
5/13/10 1:14am
5/13/10 9:15am
5/13/10 9:22am
5/13/10 9:23am
5/12/10 11:35pm
5/12/10 11:42pm
5/12/10 11:38pm
5/12/10 11:42pm
5/13/10 7:45am
5/12/10 11:59pm
5/13/10 12:48am
5/13/10 9:18am
5/13/10 10:12am
5/13/10 12:51am
5/13/10 9:24am
5/13/10 10:12am
5/13/10 5:07am
5/13/10 9:12am
5/13/10 6:36am
5/13/10 10:25pm
5/14/10 3:20pm