There is a reason that NET is talked about less and less each year.

Report problem with this ad

Mar 21, 2025
1:14:11pm

sandtrapcougar All-American

There is a reason that NET is talked about less and less each year.

It has been gamed by a lot of coaches to maximize its benefit. So yes, some human involvement is probably best.

Report problem with this ad

sandtrapcougar

Bio page: sandtrapcougar
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Last login: Apr 9, 2025
Total posts: 7,451 (272 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: Do we need a human NCAA Selection Committee in the future?

Mar 21, 1:08pm

Humans program the algorithm. You have humans either way.

paulb

Mar 21, 1:09pm

Robo-umps is the solution

bruincoug

Mar 21, 1:09pm

There is a reason that NET is talked about less and less each year.

Mar 21, 1:14pm

Net was never meant to be a final rating system. Heck the old RPI was better at that in my opinion.

kimdaddy35

Mar 21, 1:15pm

Which is why you have to keep human committee even though they are biased. I do

Mar 21, 1:23pm

Honestly, I think the BCS had it right. Use a bunch of hard evidence metrics and aggregate them and if you want to

kimdaddy35

Mar 21, 1:37pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad