My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more!
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jan 2, 2025
12:14
:57
pm
dtownCoug
Truly Addicted User
Yeah, because intent is so easy to decipher. 🙄 It’s why the indicators exist.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
dtownCoug
Bio page
dtownCoug
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Last login
Jan 5, 2025
Total posts
8,837 (6 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
This is the correct summation of targeting
Indy Coug
Loquacious Lummox
Jan 2, 12:13pm
Yeah, because intent is so easy to decipher. 🙄 It’s why the indicators exist.
dtownCoug
Jan 2, 12:14pm
So easy to define and quantify unnatural, as well as judge intent.
rainorsnow
Jan 2, 12:15pm
The issue with targeting is it has been applied very liberally time after time
idcougarfan
Jan 2, 12:16pm
and anyone who saw that hit would call it targeting, it was crown, helmet to helmet, with force, and against a
ChinaFan
Jan 2, 12:16pm
I saw the hit and do no think it was targeting. I was rooting for ASU, so a targeting call would have been nice.
HTCougar
Jan 2, 12:44pm
It was targeting. I don't see how it's debatable. Forcible contact to the neck
rha1211
Jan 2, 1:17pm
I don’t think intent is as important as outcome. Any hit to the head that results in an injury should be targeting.
Littlerich
Jan 2, 12:23pm
No, it's not. It's completely ambiguous.
SoCalCoug
Jan 2, 12:42pm
Plus, that does nothing to address the reason for the targeting rule:
SoCalCoug
Jan 2, 12:43pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
