statistically significant. It says that “The study’s findings suggest that PE acquisition has mixed consequences for patient-level outcomes overall” and then in one way has 1.1% outcome improvement and in another way has 1.4% outcome improvement, which is more than 0% but neither of which is really that massive.

It seems like you have personal experience in PE, which I think is great for this convo to get dual perspectives, but IMO you seem to be showing bias.