Got it. Without a designated punt receiver there is no interference?

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 17, 2024
2:45:00pm

GoodBetterBestBYU Walk-on

Got it. Without a designated punt receiver there is no interference?

Report problem with this ad

GoodBetterBestBYU

Previous username: goodbbetterbestBYU
Bio page: GoodBetterBestBYU
Joined: Oct 23, 2024
Last login: Nov 17, 2024
Total posts: 337 (2 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

So on the punt play, why wasn't the Kansas WR flagged for a penalty? He didn't

astroman

2:34pm

Refs no showed worse than BYU. Made 0 calls when they could’ve made some

puntersarepeople

2:37pm

Don’t know for sure, but I imagine the receiving team’s player has to actually

XORCoug

2:39pm

When it hits a player in the back of the head he wasn't preparing to catch it.

Bonoman

2:44pm

He wasn't a punt receiver. It'd be the same if the punt hit a player blocking a gunner.

foofcoug

2:41pm

Got it. Without a designated punt receiver there is no interference?

GoodBetterBestBYU

2:45pm

Doesn't have to be designated. Had Johnson turned and tried to receive the ball or signal fair catch, then you could

foofcoug

2:48pm

Pooch kick is so rare…

GoodBetterBestBYU

2:53pm

“Kick catch interference” requires an attempt to catch.

Tricky

2:56pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad