My Account
Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Nov 17, 2024
2:37
:42
pm
puntersarepeople
Truly Addicted User
Refs no showed worse than BYU. Made 0 calls when they could’ve made some
Not sure on that specific play but maybe because the DB didn’t try to catch the ball?
This message has been modified
Originally posted on Nov 17, 2024 at 2:37:42pm
Message modified by puntersarepeople on Nov 17, 2024 at 2:38:51pm
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
puntersarepeople
Bio page
puntersarepeople
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Last login
Nov 17, 2024
Total posts
36,114 (16 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
So on the punt play, why wasn't the Kansas WR flagged for a penalty? He didn't
astroman
2:34pm
Refs no showed worse than BYU. Made 0 calls when they could’ve made some
puntersarepeople
2:37pm
Don’t know for sure, but I imagine the receiving team’s player has to actually
XORCoug
2:39pm
When it hits a player in the back of the head he wasn't preparing to catch it.
Bonoman
2:44pm
He wasn't a punt receiver. It'd be the same if the punt hit a player blocking a gunner.
foofcoug
2:41pm
Got it. Without a designated punt receiver there is no interference?
GoodBetterBestBYU
2:45pm
Doesn't have to be designated. Had Johnson turned and tried to receive the ball or signal fair catch, then you could
foofcoug
2:48pm
Pooch kick is so rare…
GoodBetterBestBYU
2:53pm
“Kick catch interference” requires an attempt to catch.
Tricky
2:56pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad