Oct 10, 2024
7:10:23pm
7:10:23pm
RE: You weren't comparing WSU/OSU to P5 teams. You were comparing them to UNLV and AFA. Explain that please.
What I said that you obviously didn't understand is that BOTH UNLV (bigger media market/better stadium/better facilities) and AF (bigger fanbase/attendance) are better positioned GOING FORWARD than to loser former pac 12 members that did NOTHING with their P5 status when they had it. (Do the CAPS help?)
What makes you think either OSU or WSU will be worth anything now that they're in a renamed MWC/WAC?
What makes you think either OSU or WSU will be worth anything now that they're in a renamed MWC/WAC?
- Bio page
- ManicBlue
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2005
- Last login
- Oct 10, 2024
- Total posts
- 51,557 (944 FO)
Messages
Time
I clicked one two many articles about the new PAC/MWC and now my Twitter FYP is full of delusional PAC-12 fans
10:38am
It's a definite upgrade from the previous MWC. They should get more than previous deals but not P4 type money
11:00am
I'm not sure it's better than the previous MWC without UNLV and Air Force especially with how UNLV is doing and the
11:02am
Oregon State & Washington state are definite upgrades over those two. Dropping Hawaii, New Mexico & Wyoming is addition
11:10am
Highly disagree with that. Why do you suppose they were left out in this past realignment? Wash St, for instance, only
11:34am
Them getting left out of the ACC/B1G/Big 12 is irrelevant. And AFA and UNLV weren't called up either. Any non biased CFB
11:44am
Newsflash ... it doesn't matter what has happened in the past. Only what the future projects is what matters. I would
2:28pm
You weren't comparing WSU/OSU to P5 teams. You were comparing them to UNLV and AFA. Explain that please.
2:48pm