Ok. But if it’s 75% likely the pass was dropped, wouldn’t Miami have been robbed

Sep 28, 2024
12:21:29am

Japan Coug Intervention Needed

by the bad initial call on the field, if it hasn’t been overturned?

Which is more egregious, the bad initial call by the refs, or the bad decision to overturn the bad call?

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Sep 28, 2024 at 12:21:29am

Message modified by Japan Coug on Sep 28, 2024 at 12:21:55am

Message modified by Japan Coug on Sep 28, 2024 at 12:22:22am

Message modified by Japan Coug on Sep 28, 2024 at 12:23:05am

Report problem with this ad

Japan Coug

Bio page: Japan Coug
Joined: Feb 3, 2003
Last login: Sep 28, 2024
Total posts: 38,170 (521 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Refs need a training on what indisputable evidence means.

775coug

Sep 27, 10:03pm

I think making the right call based on what the review video shows should be

robin

Sep 27, 10:13pm

Disagree because that makes it so much easier for refs to be corrupt/biased

puntersarepeople

Sep 27, 10:14pm

It looks like a catch that gets ripped out after the player is on the ground.

Benfica1

Sep 27, 10:13pm

That's what I thought. I also though the previous play was clear PI.

runningfoo

Sep 27, 10:53pm

So even though you think there’s a 75% chance that the pass was incomplete, VT

Japan Coug

Sep 27, 10:37pm

I don’t make the rules. VT got robbed bc the refs didn’t follow them.

775coug

Sep 27, 11:01pm

Ok. But if it’s 75% likely the pass was dropped, wouldn’t Miami have been robbed

Japan Coug

12:21am

Can indisputable mean different things based upon the event taking place? Is the football stadium a court of law or..

Posting on CougarBoard