already paid good money for the games themselves).

but on the other hand isn't anti-trust usually about when big companies acting like bullies try to ice out any other competitors and ice out the little guys? that's funny to say that the MWC was in the bully position trying to wield their market power to harm WSU and OSU and that WSU and OSU had no other options. They probably would have had bad other options, but BYU faced such bad other options when they went independent (with pathetic late season schedules). I don't get why some market imbalance would have compelled WSU and OSU to enter into the contract if they had no intention of meeting the terms of the contract.