Oct 2, 2023
11:59:59am
11:59:59am
I think you're new to this graph. It's listed this way to help gamblers know which teams are trustworthy (Michigan
type teams that win because they are successful) and which are not reliable/fluky (Cincy for underperforming based on stats)
The audience for this graph understands what it's trying to say. Similar to post game expectancy win %. Gamblers trying to use advanced CFB stats to figure out who "deserved or should have won" to inform their future bets, rather than just going on head to head, score differential, etc.
The audience for this graph understands what it's trying to say. Similar to post game expectancy win %. Gamblers trying to use advanced CFB stats to figure out who "deserved or should have won" to inform their future bets, rather than just going on head to head, score differential, etc.
- Previous username
- TEXAS
- Bio page
- byuTX
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Last login
- Dec 24, 2024
- Total posts
- 76,339 (41,787 FO)
Messages
Time
10/2/23 11:29am
10/2/23 11:55am
10/2/23 12:20pm
10/2/23 12:24pm
10/2/23 12:28pm
10/2/23 12:45pm
10/2/23 12:59pm
10/2/23 1:04pm
10/2/23 11:18am
And what team had the lowest net success rate from last weekend's games? I think you're new to this graph/stat
10/2/23 11:27am
10/2/23 11:32am
10/2/23 11:46am
10/2/23 11:56am
10/2/23 12:44pm
10/2/23 1:04pm
10/2/23 1:10pm
10/2/23 1:37pm
10/2/23 1:40pm
10/2/23 1:40pm
10/2/23 12:03pm
10/2/23 11:26am
10/2/23 11:48am
10/2/23 4:14pm