Only if it isn't the last move.

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

May 19, 2021
11:31:54am

Eddie Truly Addicted User

Only if it isn't the last move.

I completely support an ongoing search and destroy mission against the hackers responsible. If you have to pay the ransom to get the fuel flowing again, I could see doing that. I would have a hard time walking away without ongoing efforts to find those responsible and bring them to justice.

Report problem with this ad

Eddie

Bio page: Eddie
Joined: Dec 12, 2002
Last login: Sep 21, 2024
Total posts: 45,454 (998 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: Do you think paying 4.4 million ransom to end the pipeline cyberattack was the right business move?

OU Cougar

5/19/21 11:27am

your answer may vary if your gas stations were completely out.

Cougarclaw

5/19/21 11:27am

What is the opportunity cost of playing hardball?

Tokolosh

5/19/21 11:29am

I don’t know enough about the business and how long it would have

cougarfann888

5/19/21 11:29am

Hopefully they were insured

BigTex

5/19/21 11:29am

They for sure had cyber insurance. It's a NIST requirement.

grosven

5/19/21 11:31am

So now the insurance company has $4.4 million in motivation to hunt them down

ryebrye

5/19/21 11:32am

Is Dog the Bounty Hunter still alive?

crack

5/19/21 11:34am

Only if it isn't the last move.

Eddie

5/19/21 11:31am

I don't know the details, but no. That's generally the wrong thing to do.

Belboz

5/19/21 11:34am

That's why there's some logic in paying the ransom

whoneedscorners?

5/19/21 11:39am

AND, this sort of thing isn't so new that companies should be so open to it

Belboz

5/19/21 11:41am

I read an article that said they have spent 200 million on it security over the

cougarfann888

5/19/21 11:43am

The problem is that most organizations think that compliance = security

whoneedscorners?

5/19/21 11:47am

compliance = checking checkboxes with auditors who know nearly nothing.

Belboz

5/19/21 11:47am

Right, but if you look at the spend of a lot of organizations

whoneedscorners?

5/19/21 12:02pm

Over the years, I've seen auditors hyper-focus on their personal pet annoyances

Belboz

5/19/21 12:18pm

it might have been for protection against intrusion

Belboz

5/19/21 11:47am

I also don't like it when people pay ransoms but I understand why some pay

fredy

5/19/21 11:51am

Do you mind telling how you got the ransomware in your company?

fredy

5/19/21 2:03pm

IFA just got attacked and they wouldn't pay. They had to just redo their entire system.

SpotOnOpinionsGuy

5/19/21 11:42am

Short term yes. Long term no. Will our intelligence agencies now re-focus?

jrifkin48

5/19/21 11:53am

Right for them, bad for the next few victims.

zonacougar

5/19/21 11:54am

Did their cyber insurer pay it or did they?

Jay Kay

5/19/21 11:57am

Obviously it must be near impossible to track where the ransom originates but it seems like

lightmann

5/19/21 11:58am

The government is well aware who most are

whoneedscorners?

5/19/21 12:01pm

You mean there's nothing they WANT to do about it.

Elwood Blues

5/19/21 12:08pm

Can anyone say -

lightmann

5/19/21 5:09pm

The FBI and cybersecurity experts have gone back and forth on 'pay or don't pay'

macdizzle

5/19/21 12:01pm

Maybe they'll secure their system better in the near future.

Shore10

5/19/21 12:04pm

Like not use passwords such as "Runner4567" or "Administrator1"

jrifkin48

5/19/21 2:45pm

They have now messed with something consider part of National security. They

Nat Gas Man

5/19/21 12:37pm

We'll see.

lightmann

5/19/21 5:10pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad