In reality, it was a garbage article, on a sketchy website, written by a person with no clue about the issue, and which misrepresented the facts in the case (read: he lied about the court decision). Furthermore, every point brought up in the piece was sourced by referencing even sketchier websites.
This doesn't remotely pass for "research" on the topic. It actually solidifies the caricature most people have of anti-vaxxers.