...they showed. I mean - you could see the ball moving around a little, but it also showed him keeping "possession" of the ball, as best as I could tell.
Then they ultimately showed another angle in which it was pretty clear that while the ball was shifting around and as he went to the ground, one whole side of the ball hit the ground. And it was during a time when he didn't have a firm grip on it. That's when I figured they would probably overturn the call. But it was a close enough call it wouldn't have shocked me either way.