Their QBR isn’t all that close. Every metric has its strength and weakness.

Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Dec 14, 2024
12:17:33pm

Charles Darwin Truly Addicted User

Their QBR isn’t all that close. Every metric has its strength and weakness.

I can understand Utahs excitement about him. Film should play a big role as well. He connected on a lot of deep balls his receivers won for him. I think it’s fair to worry about his ability to be consistent enough passing to win you close games. Retzlaff still gives me the same concern

Report problem with this ad

Charles Darwin

Bio page: Charles Darwin
Joined: Mar 21, 2020
Last login: Dec 14, 2024
Total posts: 15,678 (148 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Way home one of the few times listening

BYU71

10:45am

5’10” run first. Ok

Longseason

10:46am

Max 5’9” if he’s listed anywhere at 5’10”.

mulletino

11:00am

He was also on a bad team. He’s athletic. Could be good. Who knows?

pink22

10:48am

Dampier is a great player, he probably had offers from a lot big programs

NGB

10:49am

Were you one of the guys on 1280?

BYU71

10:50am

Cause it's a popular opinion. He's good

NGB

10:56am

He could be. I had 2 reasons why I have doubts.

BYU71

10:59am

The reason is this:

NGB

11:04am

Is there a difference between good and great, you said great?

BYU71

11:05am

You're really going to be this pedantic? Why?

NGB

12:25pm

Playing against MWC teams and going to a team where the HC is known for crippling his QBs. I like our chances

TADOW

11:35am

Why don't you provide so detail on why he is "good." The data doesn't necessarily agree with you but you keep doubling

2:16pm

What? Why? Why is there any debate in this thread?

NGB

3:49pm

They/we are doubting him because of his numbers where were expressed in the OP.

3:58pm

I think BYU fans are underestimating Dampier. He is a perfect fit for the run

spidercoug

10:51am

They’d say nicer things about him if he were transferring anywhere else

Polecat

12:35pm

Every offense needs the threat of a passing game.

BYU '80

2:02pm

Army and Navy seem to do just fine

spidercoug

6:28pm

Ran for over a thousand. He could be good. He could also be awful and he has unproven weapons. But you know

shimmy

10:55am

Better off making RB comparisons for a better reference

11:00am

I thought the Ute problem was poor

BYU71

11:03am

QBs have to either run or pass. Ute qbs couldn't do either. They were so reliant

spidercoug

11:07am

He had a higher QBR than Retzlaff

11:01am

Is there a passing comarison?

BYU71

11:04am

QBR accounts for passing, running, and opponent

11:05am

I got Retzlaff 136.4. Dampier 121.6. Correct me if wrong.

BYU71

11:14am

That is passer rating not QBR

11:17am

Right, my question above was about passing.

BYU71

11:32am

I thought the question was why were they excited about him

11:33am

Someone mentioned QBR. I then asked about passer rating. See above.

BYU71

11:36am

I thought you were talking about the OP. If you see my reply I mentioned passer

11:43am

OK, makes Jake's higher passer rating better what I showed.

BYU71

12:04pm

Their QBR isn’t all that close. Every metric has its strength and weakness.

12:17pm

67.7 vs 71.2. Is that a big difference. Does it consider level of competition?

BYU71

11:20am

It accounts for quality of opponent

11:27am

Yes it accounts for quality of defense

spidercoug

11:27am

Having watched Dampier, he’s pretty good

2:10pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad