67.7 vs 71.2. Is that a big difference. Does it consider level of competition?

Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Dec 14, 2024
11:20:36am

BYU71 Old Fellow

67.7 vs 71.2. Is that a big difference. Does it consider level of competition?

Report problem with this ad

BYU71

Bio page: BYU71
Joined: Apr 23, 2001
Last login: Dec 14, 2024
Total posts: 69,126 (1,541 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Way home one of the few times listening

BYU71

10:45am

5’10” run first. Ok

Longseason

10:46am

Max 5’9” if he’s listed anywhere at 5’10”.

mulletino

11:00am

He was also on a bad team. He’s athletic. Could be good. Who knows?

pink22

10:48am

Dampier is a great player, he probably had offers from a lot big programs

NGB

10:49am

Were you one of the guys on 1280?

BYU71

10:50am

Cause it's a popular opinion. He's good

NGB

10:56am

He could be. I had 2 reasons why I have doubts.

BYU71

10:59am

The reason is this:

NGB

11:04am

Is there a difference between good and great, you said great?

BYU71

11:05am

You're really going to be this pedantic? Why?

NGB

12:25pm

Playing against MWC teams and going to a team where the HC is known for crippling his QBs. I like our chances

TADOW

11:35am

Why don't you provide so detail on why he is "good." The data doesn't necessarily agree with you but you keep doubling

2:16pm

What? Why? Why is there any debate in this thread?

NGB

3:49pm

They/we are doubting him because of his numbers where were expressed in the OP.

3:58pm

I think BYU fans are underestimating Dampier. He is a perfect fit for the run

spidercoug

10:51am

They’d say nicer things about him if he were transferring anywhere else

Polecat

12:35pm

Every offense needs the threat of a passing game.

BYU '80

2:02pm

Ran for over a thousand. He could be good. He could also be awful and he has unproven weapons. But you know

shimmy

10:55am

Better off making RB comparisons for a better reference

11:00am

I thought the Ute problem was poor

BYU71

11:03am

QBs have to either run or pass. Ute qbs couldn't do either. They were so reliant

spidercoug

11:07am

He had a higher QBR than Retzlaff

11:01am

Is there a passing comarison?

BYU71

11:04am

QBR accounts for passing, running, and opponent

11:05am

I got Retzlaff 136.4. Dampier 121.6. Correct me if wrong.

BYU71

11:14am

That is passer rating not QBR

11:17am

Right, my question above was about passing.

BYU71

11:32am

I thought the question was why were they excited about him

11:33am

Someone mentioned QBR. I then asked about passer rating. See above.

BYU71

11:36am

I thought you were talking about the OP. If you see my reply I mentioned passer

11:43am

OK, makes Jake's higher passer rating better what I showed.

BYU71

12:04pm

Their QBR isn’t all that close. Every metric has its strength and weakness.

12:17pm

67.7 vs 71.2. Is that a big difference. Does it consider level of competition?

BYU71

11:20am

It accounts for quality of opponent

11:27am

Yes it accounts for quality of defense

spidercoug

11:27am

Having watched Dampier, he’s pretty good

2:10pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad