It’s almost impossible to not be inconsistent on some dimension, especially when

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Dec 8, 2024
12:10:55am

garyfan Truly Addicted User

It’s almost impossible to not be inconsistent on some dimension, especially when

there are so many different ways to evaluate teams (good wins, bad losses, CCG appearances).

Report problem with this ad

garyfan

Bio page: garyfan
Joined: Sep 19, 2013
Last login: Dec 23, 2024
Total posts: 40,344 (4,155 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

ASU-BSU and Alabama-SMU will be a good test of the committee's consistency.

Dec 8, 12:01am

Smu has better wins than Bsu. Four against teams with eight or more wins. Bsu

BYU '80

Dec 8, 12:04am

Yes, but Alabama had better wins than Arizona St. Same analysis. Different scale

Dec 8, 12:06am

Smu is in by the same logic as Indiana. Big mov

BYU '80

Dec 8, 12:10am

Indiana is in because they have 1 loss.

Dec 8, 12:17am

And smu had one before the ccg. Indiana didn’t make theirs

BYU '80

Dec 8, 12:19am

Tough to see the difference between Indiana and SMUs schedule. The wins and

Dec 8, 12:35am

It’s almost impossible to not be inconsistent on some dimension, especially when

garyfan

Dec 8, 12:10am

Sure, but these particular comparisons are strikingly similar.

Dec 8, 12:19am

Just plan on Bama being in. The money is flowing that way.

IronPotato

Dec 8, 6:47am

I think they will, and thus ASU should be the 3 seed based on that criteria

Dec 8, 7:47am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad