Dec 5, 2024
8:39:18pm
8:39:18pm
Yup exactly. They won't be able to just take an arbitrary chunk of donation $$
Caps at a percentage of revenue so if you donate to the university with the intent of paying players, only a small percentage can actually go towards that.
Donation $$ earmarked for player revenue sharing becomes inefficient and downright silly.
Donation $$ earmarked for player revenue sharing becomes inefficient and downright silly.
- Bio page
- rad dawg
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2010
- Last login
- Dec 12, 2024
- Total posts
- 14,490 (52 FO)
Messages
Time
Dec 5, 4:37pm
Dec 5, 4:39pm
It's not just the SEC, though they're the most notable. Ohio St had $60M in donations & $73M in tix, $33M in 'other'
Dec 5, 4:54pm
If you're curious why Clemson has been successful, despite being ACC, they brought in $85M in donations
Dec 5, 5:22pm
Imagine what our NIL would look like if we had $85M in annual donations. Our expenses are much lower than others. We
Dec 5, 7:05pm
I don't follow " so allocating those funds to NIL means lowering ticket costs,". We get about $25M per year in
Dec 5, 8:04pm
Schools will start funding NIL this coming season. And even if they don't, Tom would just need to tell a donor to send
Dec 5, 8:22pm
It's actually revenue sharing, but NIL and rev share are used interchangeably, adding to the confusion
Dec 5, 8:33pm
Dec 5, 8:39pm
Dec 5, 9:09pm
Dec 5, 9:18pm
Dec 5, 4:53pm
Dec 5, 4:56pm
Dec 5, 6:17pm