I believe his brain was thinking “it’s not a touchdown”, not “it’s not a catch.”

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 26, 2024
10:12:24am

cougfanblue Assistant to the manager

I believe his brain was thinking “it’s not a touchdown”, not “it’s not a catch.”

He was signaling as if it were a 2-point attempt. If he caught it in the end zone he would have signaled a touchdown.

Report problem with this ad

cougfanblue

Previous username: cougfantan
Bio page: cougfanblue
Joined: May 2, 2007
Last login: Nov 26, 2024
Total posts: 131,685 (39,070 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Interesting thought on the hail Mary. The refs immediately signals incomplete

Blueto

10:08am

They definitely would have reviewed it.

LifeLongLakerFan

10:09am

It would have been reviewed. Even though Mitch Matthew’s catch was called

RalphWiggam

10:09am

If it had been in the end zone it would have been called as a touchdown

Sea Chicken

10:10am

I believe his brain was thinking “it’s not a touchdown”, not “it’s not a catch.”

cougfanblue

10:12am

They probably wanted the mess to be over. They would have been beat within an inch of their lives by a bunch of drunks

AltTabbins

10:16am

I thought he did the "game is over" signal.

momowagon

10:18am

wasn't he just signaling game over?

JimmyZ

10:22am

I believe the ref’s signal of end of game was misinterpreted as incomplete pass

bluebrotha

10:24am

I think the issue was that nobody signaled it was a catch and that he was short

CameronG

11:04am

It has been said in several articles the ref was signaling end of game not incomplete pass. It has since been corrected

BYU Grounds

12:49pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad