He wasn't a punt receiver. It'd be the same if the punt hit a player blocking a gunner.

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

You don't have the ability to post right now...

Report problem with this ad

Nov 17, 2024
2:41:06pm

foofcoug Wonder what the character limi

He wasn't a punt receiver. It'd be the same if the punt hit a player blocking a gunner.

Report problem with this ad

foofcoug

Bio page: foofcoug
Joined: Jul 7, 2004
Last login: Nov 17, 2024
Total posts: 138,531 (51,478 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

So on the punt play, why wasn't the Kansas WR flagged for a penalty? He didn't

astroman

2:34pm

Refs no showed worse than BYU. Made 0 calls when they could’ve made some

puntersarepeople

2:37pm

Don’t know for sure, but I imagine the receiving team’s player has to actually

XORCoug

2:39pm

When it hits a player in the back of the head he wasn't preparing to catch it.

Bonoman

2:44pm

He wasn't a punt receiver. It'd be the same if the punt hit a player blocking a gunner.

foofcoug

2:41pm

Got it. Without a designated punt receiver there is no interference?

GoodBetterBestBYU

2:45pm

Doesn't have to be designated. Had Johnson turned and tried to receive the ball or signal fair catch, then you could

foofcoug

2:48pm

Pooch kick is so rare…

GoodBetterBestBYU

2:53pm

“Kick catch interference” requires an attempt to catch.

Tricky

2:56pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad