My question: if it was a different set of undefeateds, would you consider them dominant? Why do the names change that?

Report problem with this ad

Nov 3, 2024
6:57:18am

Soupie Grandma Sycamore

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Nov 3, 2024 at 6:57:18am

Message modified by Soupie on Nov 3, 2024 at 6:58:09am

Report problem with this ad

Soupie

Bio page: Soupie
Joined: Dec 29, 2015
Last login: Nov 5, 2024
Total posts: 102,737 (32,882 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: is the BIG12 down this year or is there more depth and developing depth?

SBB

Nov 3, 6:10am

How about there aren’t dominant teams anywhere in CFB this year

CasualFan

Nov 3, 6:15am

How typical is that? I have no idea what’s considered a normal amount of undefeated teams Nov 1.

Soupie

Nov 3, 6:31am

The SEC and ACC both look “down” by the same metrics

CasualFan

Nov 3, 6:47am

So we should be calling the SEC trash. Fair enough.

Soupie

Nov 3, 6:50am

If your standard of trash is definedd by the OP then yes.

CasualFan

Nov 3, 6:55am

My question: if it was a different set of undefeateds, would you consider them dominant? Why do the names change that?

Soupie

Nov 3, 6:57am

It’s not the names. It’s that they don’t exist

CasualFan

Nov 3, 7:09am

But I’d wager if the names of the 5 undefeated teams were as I suggested, no one would be talking abt no dominant teams

Soupie

Nov 3, 7:24am

<< Deleted >>

Soupie

Nov 3, 7:55am

Very much agree

SBB

Nov 3, 6:42am

As a whole, probably. The Big 12 is 5-8 vs the other three P4’s. OSU, TCU &

NOCAL_YFAN

Nov 3, 6:45am

*parity

eysikal

Nov 3, 7:08am

Are you sure I didn’t intend to have a comedic angle on that? 😆

SBB

Nov 3, 7:09am

The B12 is ranked 3rd and a sliver behind B1G, according to analytics

Posting on CougarBoard