We had to go out and recruit depth and were able to that bc of success in 20 &21

Report problem with this ad

Oct 16, 2024
8:26:11am

puntersarepeople Truly Addicted User

It tanked last years execution and culture (as did Funk) but ultimately worked out

Report problem with this ad

puntersarepeople

Bio page: puntersarepeople
Joined: Jan 1, 2018
Last login: Oct 16, 2024
Total posts: 35,580 (15 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

2021 Schedule vs 2024 schedule - surprisingly similar

couldge

8:02am

which made it frustrating that we weren't better prepared to handle a big12

bald man

8:04am

If this is not the most CB statement?

TheHop

8:08am

Ramping up in year 2 is impressive. We didn't have a returning QB last year that

johnnybyu

8:09am

ok. Made the regression in 2022 more maddening. Is that better?

SoBlueitHurts

1:04pm

I think last year was honestly kinda fluky. We were in a rebuild of sorts on D

RGGeemer

8:11am

Last year was “funky”

SBB

8:14am

There was zero run game too which BYU had in droves during 2021

canuckchuck

8:23am

True. Although this year hasn't been great either. LJ has helped a lot

RGGeemer

8:26am

Which also masked a weakish defense

SoBlueitHurts

1:06pm

2021 almost hurt in that it masked the weak D. Thankfully we got Hill after 2022

SoBlueitHurts

1:04pm

Interesting. I'm shocked/grateful at how quickly we've adapted to P4 football.

HarlemCoug

8:12am

We were not as far off from being prepared as our record indicated

Archaea

8:32am

We had to go out and recruit depth and were able to that bc of success in 20 &21

puntersarepeople

8:26am

Thanks for the information

KYU

1:28pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad