My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jul 19, 2021
11:29
:21
am
BlueSage
Playmaker
. . . and 50+ years later, we are still fascinated by landing a rocket and then
blasting it off again (SpaceX) except now we are doing it on Earth and not in an inhospitable environment.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
BlueSage
Bio page
BlueSage
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Last login
Jun 30, 2024
Total posts
1,556 (30 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
There were some great documentaries on the Smithsonian Channel on the Apollo missions and Apollo 11...
Coug
Truly Addicted User
7/19/21 11:16am
Pretty crazy to think. All the engines were test fired to make sure they worked, except the assent stage you mentioned.
Tesla Coug
7/19/21 11:25am
. . . and 50+ years later, we are still fascinated by landing a rocket and then
BlueSage
7/19/21 11:29am
That's not an apples to apples comparison. The LEM landing stage used the
Dread Pirate Westley
7/19/21 11:44am
And soon the vehicle will all be 100% reusable. Just refuel and go, just like an airplane.
Tesla Coug
7/19/21 11:47am
That's why they chose hypergolics for both ascent and descent stages. All you
Dread Pirate Westley
7/19/21 11:47am
What's really crazy to consider is how close Apollo's 11-14 were to failure.
Dread Pirate Westley
7/19/21 11:53am
Well and had Apollo 11 landed where it originally was supposed to land...
Coug
7/19/21 12:08pm
They missed the planned landing site due to the unexpected delta-v. You're right
Dread Pirate Westley
7/19/21 12:36pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad