We just don't agree. I think your approach is novel, but a complete waste of time. I think we are smarter than that and can realize that a team that loses a game in a small sample size can still be very clearly among the best. We have computer ranking systems. We have efficiency metrics. We have our eyes. We don't have to pretend " Ranked 50+ G5 conference winner" is just as good as others because they went undefeated against East West Tech State and friends. We don't have to watch Alabama's backups beat them by 50 to know this.