A dude runs the ball a dozen times as a freshman and there's already an analysis on him? Squally didn't show anything and might only improve a tiny bit? And heaven forbid all of these guys in their first year be expected to improve from year to year. "Analysis" on so few examples, or trying to put way too much stock into examples... Just not doing much. Come on, nobody can seriously come up with a good forecast for Burt's future only based on what we saw as a freshman. And that's just Burt. How do you really know what they're going to be going forward based on all of what we saw?