I would like a rule change that an intentional foul when you’re not down is one

Report problem with this ad

Mar 23, 2025
10:21:00pm

HRCougar Truly Addicted User

I would like a rule change that an intentional foul when you’re not down is one

Shot and the ball. It just doesn’t seem right to fouls and prevent them from shooting a three. It’s not how the game should be played.

Report problem with this ad

HRCougar

Previous username: rnormangardner
Bio page: HRCougar
Joined: Nov 22, 2004
Last login: Apr 4, 2025
Total posts: 14,572 (2,079 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I would like a rule change that an intentional foul when you’re not down is one

HRCougar

Mar 23, 10:21pm

Agree with this, but Oregon had the ball down 3 with 21.6 secs left and

Captain Stubing

Mar 23, 10:23pm

Problem is it is not an intentional foul if you’re going for the ball. I know

ColonelSaunders

Mar 23, 10:28pm

It’s a judgment call. I don’t think it would be terribly hard to adjudicate.

HRCougar

Mar 23, 10:35pm

I don't want the refs to have that kind of power.

Mr. Belding

Mar 23, 10:41pm

Neither would I but do you like the current arrangement?

HRCougar

Mar 23, 10:45pm

More than the other.

Mr. Belding

Mar 23, 10:50pm

It’s part of the game, you can’t change the rule for specific moments in it.

ColonelSaunders

Mar 23, 10:47pm

What does “it’s part of the game” mean?

HRCougar

Mar 23, 11:02pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad