My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Nov 11, 2024
9:10
:41
am
rcbyufan
Intervention Needed
The reffing snafu people should be talking about: on facemask: ref clearly asks
The umpire "did you actually see it" Because the head ref had the best view and clearly didn't see it.
He has to take the word of his compatriot.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
rcbyufan
Bio page
rcbyufan
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Last login
Nov 14, 2024
Total posts
33,010 (1,168 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
The reffing snafu people should be talking about: on facemask: ref clearly asks
rcbyufan
Nov 11, 9:10am
That was frustrating, but in game speed can see how the ref could have thought
DC12
Nov 11, 9:16am
Is that not a reviewable play? Seems like it has fairly objective criteria.
Ferb
Nov 11, 9:19am
This was my question. Batty sure wanted one with the "run it back" gesture.
LeftOfNormal
Nov 11, 9:22am
I still don’t fully understand what is reviewable- if they had reviewed it
DC12
Nov 11, 9:25am
It's not reviewable
rcbyufan
Nov 11, 9:35am
How in the world does that make sense? Of all the calls on the football field,
LeftOfNormal
Nov 11, 9:39am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad