Home Page
Message Board
News
Search
Events
Sports
Schedule
Future Schedules
Opponent Boards
Bracket Challenges
Player Interviews
Player Q&As
Social Boards
Football
Basketball
Fans
Fun Features
Post of the Day
Best of...
Visualizations
Store
My Account
Login
Sign Up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Mar 28, 2025
12:12
:05
pm
IDAHO 4 Y
All-American
Can we talk deeper about going under screens vs getting through screen vs switch
I’m just trying to understand our strategy last night.
If you go under, you’re basically inviting them to shoot a 3 ?
What could we have done different ?
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
IDAHO 4 Y
Previous username
robwayment
Bio page
IDAHO 4 Y
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Last login
Apr 3, 2025
Total posts
2,861 (21 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Can we talk deeper about going under screens vs getting through screen vs switch
IDAHO 4 Y
Mar 28, 12:12pm
I would have switched screens and stayed home with shooters. Easy to say in
Texas_forever
Mar 28, 12:13pm
We were very concerned about Sears getting downhill and getting to the FT line.
Cougz19
Mar 28, 12:17pm
That the refs didn't call moving screens didn't help.
5thGenCoug
Mar 28, 12:18pm
It’s a gamble. Go over every time and you are susceptible to pick n roll and inside game, which they are good at.
cruiserhead
Mar 28, 12:18pm
Bama had been killing people going to the hoop in the early round
Count Cougar
Mar 28, 12:18pm
We need to watch how Houston plays the screen and role
RenoCoug
Mar 28, 12:20pm
We would need Houston like players for that.
BigHouse Coug
Mar 28, 12:25pm
Sure, if we do it all game, which is why we should do it 25-50% of the time
RenoCoug
Mar 28, 1:30pm
Do you recall Bamas 3 pointers made in first half vs second half?
IDAHO 4 Y
Mar 28, 12:25pm
Number of 3s
IDAHO 4 Y
Mar 28, 12:26pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad