The reffing snafu people should be talking about: on facemask: ref clearly asks

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 11, 2024
9:10:41am

rcbyufan Intervention Needed

The reffing snafu people should be talking about: on facemask: ref clearly asks

The umpire "did you actually see it" Because the head ref had the best view and clearly didn't see it.

He has to take the word of his compatriot.

Report problem with this ad

rcbyufan

Bio page: rcbyufan
Joined: Aug 18, 2010
Last login: Nov 14, 2024
Total posts: 33,021 (1,169 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

The reffing snafu people should be talking about: on facemask: ref clearly asks

rcbyufan

Nov 11, 9:10am

That was frustrating, but in game speed can see how the ref could have thought

DC12

Nov 11, 9:16am

Is that not a reviewable play? Seems like it has fairly objective criteria.

Ferb

Nov 11, 9:19am

This was my question. Batty sure wanted one with the "run it back" gesture.

Nov 11, 9:22am

I still don’t fully understand what is reviewable- if they had reviewed it

DC12

Nov 11, 9:25am

It's not reviewable

rcbyufan

Nov 11, 9:35am

How in the world does that make sense? Of all the calls on the football field,

Nov 11, 9:39am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad